Comparing Cement Emissions: UltraTech, Ambuja and Dalmia

    Three large Indian cement makers publish emission intensity figures that look comparable but are not. Their latest reported numbers, the differences in units, boundaries, scopes and assurance, and how to compare them properly. Educational, not investment advice.

    SG

    Gajji Srinath, Founder, The Valuation Node

    Published 8 min read
    Bookmark
    A cement works lit up at dusk

    Key takeaway

    Three large Indian cement makers publish emission intensity figures that look comparable but are not. Their latest reported numbers, the differences in units, boundaries, scopes and assurance, and how to compare them properly. Educational, not investment advice.

    Before you read this: Sector map: cement, GHG accounting: Scopes 1, 2 and 3, India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme

    Intuition

    Cement companies like to quote their carbon intensity, the kilograms of CO2 emitted per tonne of product, and some describe their figures as among the lowest in the world. With India's carbon market now setting targets for cement plants, these numbers matter for costs as well as reputation.

    But comparing them is harder than it looks. Companies use different units (per tonne of cement or per tonne of cementitious material), different scopes (Scope 1 only, or Scope 1 and 2), gross or net figures, different boundaries (standalone or group, before or after acquisitions) and different levels of assurance. This piece sets out the latest figures each company has published and shows what must be checked before ranking them.

    Mechanics

    Reported figures

    CompanyMetric as reportedLatestEarlierTargetAssurance
    UltraTech CementScope 1 gross intensity, kg CO2 per tonne of cementitious material578 (FY 2025-26)595 (FY 2024-25); 716 (FY 2016-17 baseline)557 by FY 2029-30 (sustainability-linked bond target)Limited assurance (TÜV SÜD for FY 2025-26; BDO for FY 2024-25)
    Ambuja CementsScope 1 intensity, kg CO2 per tonne of cementitious material (standalone, including merged Sanghi and Penna in FY 2025-26)595 (FY 2025-26)537 (FY 2024-25)440 by 2030BRSR Core reasonable assurance (SGS India for FY 2025-26)
    Dalmia BharatCarbon footprint, kg CO2 per tonne of cement465 (FY 2024-25)Not given in the sourceNot given in the sourceNot stated in the press release

    Other reported indicators

    CompanyRenewable or green energyOther
    UltraTechGreen power 36.87% of electricity in Q4 FY 2025-26 (31.5% in Q4 FY 2024-25)Absolute gross Scope 1 of 8.89 crore tCO2 in FY 2025-26
    Ambuja28% renewable and green energy in FY 2024-25 (target 60%); renewables 6.0% of total energy in FY 2025-26 (calculated from BRSR)Clinker factor 67% and thermal substitution rate 9% in FY 2024-25
    DalmiaRenewable share of consumption 36.4% in FY 2024-25; 449 MW of operational renewable capacity at the end of FY 2025-26Describes its footprint as one of the lowest in the global cement industry

    Five checks before comparing

    1. Unit. Per tonne of cement or per tonne of cementitious material (cement plus clinker sold)? Dalmia's figure is per tonne of cement; the other two are per tonne of cementitious material. A company selling a lot of clinker will show different numbers on each basis.
    2. Scope and gross or net. Scope 1 only, or Scope 1 and 2? Gross, or net of emissions from waste-derived fuels? UltraTech states gross Scope 1. Dalmia's release does not say.
    3. Boundary. Ambuja's FY 2025-26 figure includes newly merged plants, and its intensity rose from 537 to 595. UltraTech has also acquired The India Cements and merged Kesoram's cement business; its FY 2025-26 report does not say clearly whether these are inside the reported boundary.
    4. Year. The latest available Dalmia intensity in the sources is for FY 2024-25; the others are for FY 2025-26.
    5. Assurance. Reasonable assurance gives more comfort than limited assurance, and a press release figure may not be assured at all.

    Conclusions from the data

    • UltraTech's Scope 1 intensity fell from 716 in FY 2016-17 to 578 in FY 2025-26, a cut of about 19%, with 21 kg still to go to its FY 2029-30 target of 557.
    • Ambuja's Scope 1 intensity rose by about 11% in FY 2025-26 after its mergers, moving it further from its 2030 target of 440.
    • Dalmia reports the lowest figure of the three, but on a different unit and for an earlier year, so a direct ranking is not possible from these sources alone.

    Advanced details

    CCTS uses its own definitions. India's carbon market sets plant-level targets on its own product definitions and baseline years. Company-level intensities in sustainability reports cannot be compared directly with CCTS targets. Plant data from the CCTS notifications is the right basis for estimating certificate costs or income.

    Blended cement and clinker factor. A higher share of blended cement (which uses fly ash or slag in place of clinker) lowers intensity. Product mix, as well as kiln efficiency, drives the differences between companies.

    Acquisitions as a theme. Indian cement has consolidated quickly, with older and less efficient plants changing hands. Expect intensity to rise for some acquirers before upgrades bring it down. Ask each company for plant-level plans for acquired capacity.

    Same company, several numbers. One company can report gross and net figures, standalone and consolidated figures, and per-cement and per-cementitious figures in different documents. Always record the exact definition next to each number.

    Common mistakes

    • Ranking companies on headline numbers. Units, boundaries and scopes differ.
    • Ignoring acquisitions. They can move intensity sharply in one year.
    • Treating a press release figure like an assured one.
    • Comparing company averages with plant-level CCTS targets.

    Key terms

    Sources

    Sources

    Figures and claims come from the sources named in the text: company filings, exchange disclosures, and rating agency reports, as cited. See the editorial philosophy for how sources are chosen.

    Cite this article

    Gajji, S. (2026). "Comparing Cement Emissions: UltraTech, Ambuja and Dalmia." The Valuation Node. https://valuationnode.com/analysis/esg-analysis/cement-emissions-comparison

    Discussion

    Commenting as a guest. Add a name if you like, or leave it blank to post as Anonymous. Log in to comment as yourself.

    Educational analysis, not investment advice. The author may hold positions in securities discussed; where relevant, this is stated above. See the disclaimer.

    Stay in the loop

    Roughly one email per month. No spam, no upsells.

    SG

    Gajji Srinath

    Founder of The Valuation Node. MBA candidate at NIT Rourkela.

    LinkedIn